Economics 201 - Principles of Macroeconomics
Instructor:
D. Vandegrift
Office:
Business Building -- Room 218
Office
Hours: Tues. 2-4pm, Wed. 11-12pm, or by appointment
Telephone:
(609) 771-2294
e-mail:
vandedon@tcnj.edu
homepage:
www.tcnj.edu/~vandedon
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Text: Gwartney,
James D., Stroup, Richard L., and Sobel, Russell L., 2000, Economics: Private and Public Choice, 9th ed. (Dryden Press, New
York).
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Course Objective:
In microeconomics, we studied the economic decisions of individuals and firms.
Here, we will analyze the whole (national) economy or large sectors of it. Just
as in microeconomics, the ultimate aim of the course is economic literacy. By
the end of the course, most discussions of macroeconomic topics that appear in The
Wall Street Journal or The New York
Times should be clear to you.
Economic
literacy requires that we describe the measures of performance (economic
aggregates) for the national economy and explain the ways in which the measures
of performance are related. Finally, we must assess the effects of government
policy aimed at improving the performance of the national economy.
I
know what you're thinking. It does sound
pretty difficult. But you shouldn't be intimidated. You hear about this stuff on
the evening news every day. Economic aggregates (e.g., GDP, inflation,
unemployment) are the focus of a large amount of news coverage. Implicit in many
of the discussions is the way that the aggregates are related. For instance,
rising levels of unemployment usually imply slower economic growth (i.e., GDP
growth). But the relationships can, at times, be confusing. So to analyze the
relationships, we will build economic models of the macroeconomy.
The
models are useful beyond simply understanding the relationships between economic
aggregates. We can use the economic models to understand what the government can
do (if anything) to improve the measures of economic performance. This is
critical. Election campaigns and important policy debates center on competing
claims about what the government ought to do to stabilize or stimulate the
economy.
Exams and Grading:
There will be two midterm exams, a final, and three problem sets. The final is
cumulative. Because I distribute the answers on the date that the problem sets
are due, I do not accept late problem sets. If you have difficulty completing a
problem set, see me before the date on which the assignment is due. Weights for
each requirement and the grading scale are as follows:
Problem
Sets: 10%
92-100 -
A
80-81 -
B- 67-69
- D+
Midterms:
40%
90-91
- A- 77-79
- C+ 62-66
- D
Paper
15%
87-89 -
B+
72-76 -
C
0 -62 -
F
Final:
35% 82-86
- B
70-71 -
C-
100%
The Paper:
To complete this course, you must read a book related to macroeconomics and
write a paper about the book. The paper should be 5 or 6 typed, double-spaced
pages (excluding cover page, references, tables, charts, etc) and in the format
of a book review. I have attached a list of acceptable titles. If you want to
use a book that is not on the list, you must clear it with me in
advance. I will not accept papers on unapproved titles. The due date for the
paper is Monday, March
5.
In
the paper, you must discuss the thesis of the book and analyze the argument. To
analyze the argument, you must consult and cite at least one other source. Your
best bet is an article from an economics journal or a newspaper. Consulting
other sources will enable you to comment on specific aspects of the book or
describe some of the strengths and weaknesses of the book's argument. To find
articles, I suggest that you use Lexis-Nexis or Ebsco Host. Lexis-Nexis and
Ebsco Host are databases of newspaper and journal articles. They are available
on the library's web page.
For
some ideas on how to write a book review, you may want to read a few reviews of
non-fiction books. Finding a non-fiction book review isn’t hard. Nearly every
journal publishes book reviews (e.g., Business
Week, The New Republic, etc.). The New
York Times publishes an entire section of book reviews every Sunday. Because
you are only interested in the format and style of a book review, the reviews
need not consider the book or topic that you have chosen.
Do
not cite book reviews of the particular book that you select. Other reviewer’s
opinions of the book tend not to add much to the paper. You may use the web to
search for articles from journals, magazines and newspapers. But please do not
cite anything that was published only
on the web. There are too many crackpots with web sites. If you use the web
to find articles, cite only the periodical in which it was published. You may
follow the example set out below in the Course Organization section. Do not cite
web addresses.
Grading
papers isn't much fun. So I wouldn't assign a paper unless I thought you would
gain something by completing one. In particular, I hope that the paper forces
you to think a bit about economic issues beyond the course. Maybe you'll even
like the book. The paper also represents a chance to work on your writing
skills. Writing clearly about complex issues is an important skill. Because I
take writing seriously, I also take plagiarism seriously. Do not claim anyone
else’s writing or ideas as your own. Violations of this rule will be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
In
grading your paper, I will pay close attention to the clarity of your writing.
The quality of your writing will determine a significant portion of your grade.
Be sure that your sentences are coherent and that each paragraph follows from
the previous paragraph. A good way to avoid a poorly written paper is to take a
look at a manual of style. I recommend either The Writing of Economics by Donald N. McCloskey or The
Elements of Style by William Strunk and E. B. White.
Suggested Titles
Barro,
Robert, 1996, Getting It Right: Markets
and Choices in a Free Society (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Bhagwati,
Jagdish, 1990, Protectionism (MIT
Press, Cambridge).
Bhagwati,
Jagdish, 1993, India in Transition:
Freeing the Economy (Oxford University Press, New York).
Blinder,
Alan, 1994, Hard Heads, Soft Hearts
(Addison-Wesley, New York).
Cox,
W. Michael and Alm, Richard, 1999, Myths
of Rich and Poor: Why We’re Better Off Than We Think (Basic Books, New
York).
Eisner,
Robert, 1995, The Misunderstood Economy:
What Counts and How to Count It (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Friedman,
Milton, 1962, Capitalism and Freedom
(University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Krugman,
Paul, 1994, Peddling Prosperity: Economic
Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations (W.W. Norton and
Co., New York).
Krugman,
Paul, 1996, Pop Internationalism (MIT
Press, Cambridge).
Krugman,
Paul, 1997, The Age of Diminished
Expectations (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Levy,
Frank, 1998, The New Dollars and Dreams: American Incomes and Economic Change
(Sage Foundation, New York).
Schiller,
Robert, 2000, Irrational Exuberance (Princeton University Press,
Princeton).
I.
National Income Accounting and Economic Growth
a. GDP Characteristics (pp. 168-176)
b. Real v. Nominal GDP (pp. 177-180)
c. Problems with GDP (pp. 180-188)
B. Bartlett, “The High Cost of Turning Green,” The
Wall Street Journal, Sept. 14, 1994, p. A18.
“Other Women’s Movement: Wages for Housework,” The
Trenton Times, Jan. 2, 1998, p. A12.
G. Burkins and S. Lueck, “GDP Posted 4.8% Increase in 3rd
Period” The Wall Street Journal,
Oct. 29, 1999, p. A2.
L. Rohter, “Columbia Adjusts Economic Figures to Include Its Drug
Crops,” The New York Times, June 27, 1999,
p. 3.
P. Passell, “Every Second Counts Even More,” The New York Times,
June 28, 1999, p. 9.
e. Trends In Income Inequality (pp. 714-723) (not listed)
J. Schlesinger, “Low Wage Workers Make Strong Gains,” The
Wall Street Journal, Feb. 5, 1999, p. A2.
f. Productivity and Growth (pp. 683-689) (not listed)
“A Working Hypothesis,” The
Economist, May 11, 1996, p. 74.
“Work in Progress,” The Economist, July 24, 1999, pp. 21-24.
L. Uchitelle, “In a Productivity Surge, No Proof of a New Economy,” The
New York Times, Oct. 8, 2000, p. 6 (BU).
g. Net Foreign Investment and International Trade (pp. 236-239)
II.
Inflation, Unemployment and Business Cycles
a. Business Cycles (pp. 192-194)
b. Index of Leading Indicators (pp. 385-386)
M.Phillips, “Make-Up of Leading Indicators May Shift,” The
Wall Street Journal, Aug. 12, 1996, p. A2.
A. Bodipo-Memba, “New-Home Sales Fell 3.6% in December,” The
Wall Street Journal, Feb. 3, 1999, p. A2.
c. Unemployment (pp. 194-202 & 204-205)
C. Duff, “Unemployment Remains at Low Level,” The
Wall Street Journal, Jan. 12, 1998, p. A2.
d. Full Employment (pp.
202-203 & 740-750) (pp. 202-203 & 491-501)
“A Bad Case of Arthritis,” The
Economist, Feb. 26, 1994, pp. 70-71.
H. Cooper and T. Kamm, “Loosening Up: Much of Europe Eases Its Rigid
Labor Laws and Temps Proliferate,”
The Wall Street Journal, June
4, 1998, p. A1.
E. Andrews, “With German Craft Rules, Its Hard Just to Get Work,” The
New York Times, Feb. 7, 1999, p. 16.
C. Tejada, “Strong Labor Market May Linger,” The
Wall Street Journal, Sept. 11, 2000, p. A1.
R. Barro, “Higher Minimum Wage, Higher Dropout Rate,” The
Wall Street Journal, Jan. 11, 1996, p. A14.
e. Unemployment and International Trade
M. Prospero, “N.J. Delegates make case for China’s exclusion from WTO,”
The Trenton Times, Dec. 9, 1999, p.
D1.
f. Inflation (pp. 205-210)
L. Bird, “Next Christmas, the French Hens Will Be Whining for a Big
Raise,” The Wall Street Journal,
Nov. 12, 1996,
p. B1.
M. Boskin, “Prisoners of Faulty Statistics,” The
Wall Street Journal, Dec. 5, 1996, p. A18.
F. Norris, “Sorry, Wrong Numbers,” The
New York Times, Dec. 1, 1996, p. 5.
C. Duff, “Eyes on the Price: Is the CPI Accurate?,” The
Wall Street Journal, Jan. 16, 1997, p. A1.
A. Bodipo-Memba, “Drop in Inflation Isn’t as Large as It Seems,” The
Wall Street Journal, May 11, 1999, p. A2.
III.
An Introduction to Macroeconomic Models
a. Aggregate Demand (pp. 216-222)
b. Aggregate Supply (pp. 222-225)
“Economy Presents Early Gift,” The
Trenton Times, Dec. 8, 1999, p. A19.
c. The Phillips Curve (pp. 766-776) (p.518-527)
“Paradigm Lost,” The Economist, Nov. 3, 1990, pp. 84-85.
d. Equilibrium in the Goods and Services Market (pp. 225-231)
e. Loanable Funds (pp. 231-236)
IV.
Using the AS - AD Model
a. Shifts in Aggregate Demand (pp. 244-251)
G. Ip,
“The Wealth Effect is Back in Play,”
The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 25, 1997, p. A1.
M.
Phillips, “Trade Gap Widened by 15% in September,”
The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 22, 2000, p. A2.
M. Moffet, “As U.S. Sneezes, Neighbors Fear a Cold,” The
Wall Street Journal, Dec. 12, 2000, p. A21.
b. Shifts in Aggregate Supply (pp. 251-260)
c. Macroeconomic Adjustment (pp. 261-266)
Problem Set #1 Due (Feb. 19)
Midterm #1 (Feb.
22)
V.
Fiscal Policy
a. Keynesian Foundations (pp. 270-272 & 281-289)
b. Keynesian Fiscal Policy (pp. 294-298)
c. Crowding Out (pp. 299-301)
d. New Classical Fiscal Policy (pp 301-303)
“The Public Purse,” The Economist, Nov. 24, 1990, pp. 77-78.
B. Spindle, “Japan’s Massive Debt Bomb Ticks Ever Louder”
The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 11, 2000, p. A27.
e. The Timing of Fiscal Policy Changes (pp. 303-307)
J. Chait, “Cut to the Chase,” The New Republic, Dec. 18, 2000,
p.13-14.
f. Supply Side Effects of Fiscal Policy (pp. 307-310)
M. Feldstein, “What the '93 Tax Increases Really Did,” The
Wall Street Journal, Oct. 26, 1995, p. A12.
g. Fiscal Policy Evidence (pp. 310-315)
VI.
Money and the Banking System
a. The Role of Money (pp. 320-322)
b. Defining the Money Supply (pp. 322-324 & 341-345)
R. Lowenstein, “Remember M1? It's Staging a Comeback,” The
Wall Street Journal, Jan. 4, 1996, p C1.
c. The Banking System (pp. 324-330)
d. The Federal Reserve System (pp. 331-340)
J. Wilke, “Showing Its Age: Fed’s Huge Empire, Set Up Years Ago, Is
Costly and Inefficient,” The Wall Street
Journal, Sept. 12, 1996, p. A1.
J. Wilke, “Who Is Predicting the Fed’s Next Move?” The
Wall Street Journal, Oct. 22, 1996. p. A1.
e. Current Problems in Banking (pp. 345-346)
VII.
Monetary Policy
a. Money Demand and Money Supply (pp. 352-355)
b. Monetary Policy in the Short Run (pp. 356-361)
c. Monetary Policy in the Long Run (pp. 361-371)
M. Friedman, “The Fed and the Natural Rate,” The
Wall Street Journal, Sept. 9, 1996, p. A17.
d. Evidence (pp. 371-375)
Problem Set #2 (Mar. 29)
Midterm #2 (Apr. 2)
VIII.
Debt and Deficits
a. Balanced Budgets and the National Debt (pp. 752-755) (pp. 504-507)
b. The Economic Effect of the Debt (pp. 755-762) (pp. 507-514)
“The Burdensome National Debt,” The
Economist, Feb. 10, 1996, pp. 68-69.
L. Uchitelle, “Debt Debate Ignores the Country’s Other Options,” The
New York Times, Oct. 22, 2000, p. 4 (BU).
c. Financing Social Security (pp. 780-790) (pp.532-542)
D. Wessel, “Social Security with Subtitles,” The
Wall Street Journal, Dec. 7, 1998, p. A1.
IX.
International Trade
a. Gains From Trade (pp. 434-444)
B. Davis, “Tackling Trade Issue Takes a Lot of Courage,” The
Wall Street Journal, Jan. 8, 1996, p. A1.
b. The Economics of Trade Restrictions (pp. 444-448)
c. Arguments for Protection (pp. 448-457)
P. Krugman, “Competitiveness, A Dangerous Obsession, ” The
Wall Street Journal, Feb. 28, 1994, p. A14.
S. Golub, “America-Firsters Have It Backward,” The
Wall Street Journal, Jan. 16, 1996, p. A14.
X.
International Finance
a. Flexible Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market
(pp. 462-470)
b. Balance of Payments and Macroeconomic Policy (pp. 470-482)
c. Fixed Exchange Rates and Balance of Payments (pp. 482-486)
Problem Set #3 Due (Apr. 26)
Final Exam