| |
Article Review by Denise Katsoupas
Numerous studies have been done
and much research has been gathered on the reading strategy which involves guessing (Dycus,1997).
Findings indicate that it is quite popular and adopted by numerous educators. Although
it was
initially presented as a means of teaching the meaning of unknown
words from
context to native L1 learners, the "guessing strategy"
has been applied to L2 learners as well. This article
analyzes the reading process and discusses various perspectives of when
this particular strategy is effective, and to
what degree. Finally, it presents studies which indicate
its effectiveness
justify its use, and at the same time questions whether or not
it should
actually be used by adult L2 learners.
This article review has two purposes:
(a) to demonstrate that active
teaching of vocabulary is crucial to effective reading comprehension
and that
it must correlate listening, speaking, and reading components;
and (b) to
suggest that although studies show that the strategy of guessing
and word
association may enhance and assist general comprehension in certain
cases, it
may hinder and obstruct learning in others.
The theories which support guessing
word meaning from context are based
on studies which indicate that word association enhances vocabulary
and words
can be better recognized if they are taken in context than out
of context
(Coady and Nation,1988; Liu and Nation, 1985). Supporters
feel that
traditional instructional methods of vocabulary teaching are
time consuming
and lengthy. Some believe that dictionary usage interrupts
the flow of
reading (Brown, 1972). Others feel that we can justify
the use of the
guessing strategy due to the tremendous amount of words in the
English
language that actually need to be learned. The article
includes evidence that there are,
however, interesting conclusions regarding vocabulary teaching
(Barnett,1988;
Laufer,1996) and its importance.
Guessing is a very sophisticated strategy.
As ESL teachers, in many
cases we deal with unsophisticated learners. In the American
educational
system, each and every student is educated no matter how disadvantaged
they
are. In this article, readers are classified only as "beginners",
"intermediate" and "advanced". The reality is that many of
our L2 learners come from backgrounds of no education,
weak education, generally lacking
intellectually. A professor who has never taught in a situation
with this type of students would be more likely to say that
perhaps Goodman’s (1967) famous model of
"reading as a psycholinguistic guessing game" is a possibility.
The
studies
that were mentioned in this article seemed to be centered around
elite groups
of well-educated, intelligent students with confidence
and self-esteem. A
far more realistic presentation should have included the disadvantaged
L2
learners as well.
Based on my experience, I have learned
that a more selective and
eclectic approach that suits the needs of the learner and the
teacher is
imperative from the very beginning. You cannot assume that
L2 learners have
guessing strategy abilities or any amount of vocabulary storage.
We, as
teachers, are responsible for helping and guiding our students
to develop a
vocabulary by correlating listening, speaking and reading.
They need the
oral component, they do need to be taught vocabulary, and they
must hear a
great deal of
meaningful language.
There are many methods teachers use to
teach vocabulary or to encourage
vocabulary self-learning by their students. Through my
experience I have
observed that words learned intentionally through reading are
better retained
than words that are just stumbled upon and casually learned.
L2 learners
need multiple readings of new material. Teachers should
first preview the
text for troublesome words and say these words and their dictionary
meanings
into a tape. By first identifying the unknown words and
their meanings, the
words become familiar and the teacher can then discuss the content
of the
text with the students and encourage oral repetition. Using a
cassette tape
for reinforcement is extremely effective since the students can
take it home
and as they listen to it the language comes alive again.
Dictionary use
should be encouraged and in no way should it be considered
as a means of
interrupting the flow or reading (Brown,1972). The teacher
must assist in
finding the definitions since even the dictionary may need a
guessing
strategy. Sometimes inferential skill is needed to decide which
meaning is
correct, based on the understanding of the context, and for our
L2 learners
this is often impossible to do on their own. By seeing, hearing,
and then
reading this word’s definition, they increase their
chances of remembering
the word and gain a better understanding of what they are reading.
If the
learner does not have teacher assistance in this manner, the
average learner
will ignore the unknown word, skip over it, miss the meaning
of the sentence,
the meaning of the paragraph, and in many cases, the meaning
of the entire
story. A more highly motivated or intelligent learner will
use the
dictionary but will have difficulty when there are multiple meanings.
When
the text has many new words, students quickly despair and are
discouraged.
When the vocabulary of the text is more familiar, students are
more likely to
continue with the reading task. I strongly feel that mastery
of vocabulary
is crucial to language literacy. Although it is time-consuming,
it is well
worth the effort..
3
Walter Lidman, former New Jersey Bilingual
/ ESL Teacher of the Year,
has provided a meaningful dimension to my research. His extensive
background
and wealth of experience in the education of minority learners
has certainly
given me valuable insight. According to W. Lidman (personal
communication,
September 22, 2000), after the vocabulary is read aloud and understood,
actual reading of the text takes place. The teacher should always
do the
first reading. Subsequently, students will want to read
and should be
encouraged to do so. Reading lessons should be divided
into manageable
parts. Beginners first learn to read. Confidence and experience
together
with teacher’s guidance helps L2 learners to read
and comprehend. The new
words are now understood and reinforced as meaningful questions
about the
story are discussed. Lidman insists that a large vocabulary
is not a
prerequisite for L2 learners and fully supports views on active
teaching of
vocabulary. Having worked under his tutelage, I tend to
agree with him. When
students are ready, they will begin to read.
The article in question mentions that
the successful use of the guessing
strategy often depends on the extent of global knowledge.
I agree with
theorists who support that in some cases, L2 readers can
predict the content
of a text on the basis of a pre-existing schema. When students
read, these
schema help the reader to decode and interpret the message beyond
the printed
words. The intelligent, older, more proficient reader,
is predicting,
hypothesizing, and reorganizing his understanding of the message
as it
unfolds while reading. I have observed this quality in
my husband, an
intelligent, educated, adult L2 learner. In essence, he
is subconsciously
using the skills he mastered as he learned his native Greek language
and is
applying these skills to his ESL learning. My question,
however, is how
affective is all this "guessing" even at this level? I
find the
answers to
this question vague as well as unclear. Timothy Bell from
Kuwait University,
in his article "Extensive Reading: Why? And How?’’
(Internet TESL
Journal),
mentions Tsang’s study (1996) where silent
reading is encouraged. I cannot
see how an L2 learner can aquire vocabulary growth and genuine
understanding
of the text effectively through this silent, self-inflicted guessing
method.
Any type of silent reading presupposes student initiated guessing
strategies.
How do we know if they have guessed correctly? Perhaps
only a select, elite
group of L2 learners will be successful at the guessing strategy.
I have
found, through my husband’s experiences, that guessing
word meaning often
causes misunderstanding.
L2 learners are inclined to increase their reading and speaking
command of a
language if there is a structured method such as vocabulary teaching
and if
the learning is meaningful to the learner. Social class,
individual
situation, and attitude, must be considered when researching
and
experimenting with strategies. It is important to remember that
all learners
are individuals and have different needs. Teaching should
be geared towards
these needs.
|